Alaska teen testifies on climate change

Note: We ask republishing partners to include a pixel to help us measure story reach. The only information this tracker gathers is the publication domain and date, and view counts. For questions, email syndication@grist.org

HTML

PLAIN TEXT

<h1>Alaska teen testifies on climate change</h1>
 
 "This story was originally published by <a href="https://grist.org" title="Grist">Grist</a>. Sign up for Grist's <a href="https://go.grist.org/signup/weekly/partner?utm_campaign=republish-content&utm_medium=syndication&utm_source=partner" title="Weekly newsletter">weekly newsletter here</a>."
 
 <div class="entry">
<iframe loading="lazy" width="425" height="319" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9lEBZBTrfpo?fs=1&feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
That’s Cheryl Lockwood of <a href="http://ayea.org/WordPress">Alaska Youth for Environmental Action</a> testifying at a 2007 hearing, “Youth Leadership on Climate Change” of The Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming.  At the time, Limbaugh mocked her for crying, as Media Matters <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200711060006?f=h_top">discussed</a>:
<blockquote>LIMBAUGH: A lot of communities in trouble over a lot of things. Go to New Orleans. How about losing homes? Wah, wah — sorry. I’m just reminded here of the old — remember the old television PSA that used to run back in the old days when we were kids? Iron Eyes Cody, the Indian — the Native American, sorry — standing by the roadside as, you know….</blockquote>
Yes, for Rush, if you’ve seen one crying native American….  But I digress.
It is remarkable how many Alaskan conservatives give a nod to climate change — since it is blatantly burning up and melting down their state — but not climate science. We’ve seen that with Palin, who couldn’t miss the “thawing permafrost and retreating sea ice,” but remains <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/08/climategate-washington-post-sarah-palin-science-hide-the-decline/">willfully blind to the cause</a>.
Senator Lisa Murkowski is also painfully aware of how her state is being radically and rapidly ruined by climate change.  Indeed, in a 2006 <a href="http://www.arcus.org/federal/senator_murkowski/index.html">speech</a> on the subject (video <a href="http://media.arcus.org/displayimage.php?pos=-22164">here</a>, and it’s better than the prepared remarks), she described some of the worst impacts — including devastating wildfires:
<a href="http://www.alaska-in-pictures.com/forest-fire-1076-pictures.htm"> </a>
<blockquote>… one area that I believe we cannot lose focus on is the human dimension.  Our policies of today, and our policies of tomorrow, have a direct impact on those who live in the Arctic region….</blockquote>
<blockquote>When I visit the Native villages in northern Alaska, I ask the village elders what climate change means to them. They don’t speak about the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, or attempt to debunk the now infamous hockey stick theory.
They tell me what they have personally observed over the years. Native whaling captains tell me that the ice pack is less stable, and that there is more open water requiring them to travel greater distances to hunt. The snow pack is coming later and melting earlier than in years past. Salmon are showing up in subsistence nets in greater numbers across the arctic.  Different types of vegetation now grow where they never grew before.  The migratory patterns of animals have changed.  Warmer, drier air, has allowed the voracious spruce bark beetle to migrate north, moving through our forests in the south-central part of the state. At last count, over three million acres of forest land has been devastated by the beetle, providing dry fuel for outbreaks of enormous wild fires. To give you some perspective, that is almost the size of Connecticut.
So we recognize that times have changed, things are changing, and we need a new Arctic policy.</blockquote>
And yet she tried to stop the EPA from regulating carbon pollution (see <a title="Permanent Link to Lisa Murkowski proposes to fiddle while Alaska burns" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/09/2009/09/21/lisa-murkowski-fiddle-while-alaksa-burns-epa-regulation/" rel="bookmark">here</a>).
I still hope Murkowskii will be voting for the bipartisan climate and clean energy bill, but Palin is strongly attacking it.  Palin’s do-nothing policy would let the whole damn state melt and burn (see “<a title="Permanent Link to M.I.T. doubles its 2095 warming projection to 10°F — with 866 ppm and Arctic warming of 20°F" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/09/2009/09/21/2009/05/20/mit-doubles-global-warming-projections-2/" rel="bookmark">M.I.T. doubles its 2095 warming projection to 10°F — with 866 ppm and Arctic warming of 20°F</a>“).
Gore rebutted Palin today in an <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34325366/ns/politics/">interview with NBC’s Andrea Mitchell</a>:
[vodpod id=ExternalVideo.1012244&w=425&h=350&fv=]
<blockquote>The former presidential candidate said “the deniers are persisting in an era of unreality. The entire North Polar ice cap is disappearing before our eyes … what do they think is happening?”</blockquote>
Gore then talked about the well-known science that CO2 traps heat, that humans are the cause of most recent warming (see “<a title="Permanent Link to What percentage of global warming is due to human causes vs. natural causes?" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/12/09/2009/12/02/realclimate-gavin-schmidit-what-fraction-of-global-warming-is-due-to-human-causes-vs-natural-causes/" rel="bookmark">What percentage of global warming is due to human causes vs. natural causes?</a>“)
<blockquote>Gore said Wednesday that the scientific community has worked intensively on the issue for twenty years. “It’s a principle in physics,” he told Mitchell. “It’s like gravity, it exists.”</blockquote>
Palin doesn’t do many MSM interviews anymore.  She is now communicating on this subject primarily through the Washington Post editorial page and Facebook — a sad commentary on the former as WashPost’s own Ezra Klein <a href="http://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/6501698136">tweeted today</a>:
<blockquote>Places Sarah Palin publishes her crazy: 1) The Washington Post op-ed page. 2) Facebook. Sigh.</blockquote>
So on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=193694168434">Facebook</a>, Palin willfully misinterpreted Gore (yes, I know, you’re shocked):
<blockquote>The response to my op-ed by global warming alarmists has been interesting. Former Vice President Al Gore has called me a “denier” and informs us that climate change is “a principle in physics. It’s like gravity. It exists.”
Perhaps he’s right. Climate change is like gravity – a naturally occurring phenomenon that existed long before, and will exist long after, any governmental attempts to affect it.
However, he’s wrong in calling me a “denier.” As I noted in my op-ed above and in <a title="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=188540473434" href="http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=193694168434&h=51bb4121a6785ca279154ce4196a6a84&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fnote.php%3Fnote_id%3D188540473434" target="_blank">my original Facebook post on Climategate</a>, I have never denied the existence of climate change. I just don’t think we can primarily blame man’s activities for the earth’s cyclical weather changes.</blockquote>
No, it’s isn’t “climate change” that is “principle in physics” Gore was referring to.  It was the heat-trapping nature of greenhouse gases.
Palin isn’t a “denier” because she’s not paying attention enough to the issue to be denying what scientists are saying.  She’s just an a 
nti-science ideologue, parroting right-wing talking points.
</div>
<script type="text/javascript"> toolTips('.classtoolTips1','Carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and other gases that prevent heat from escaping Earth’s atmosphere. Together, they act as a blanket to keep the planet at a liveable temperature in what is known as the “greenhouse effect.” Too many of these gases, however, can cause excessive warming, disrupting fragile climates and ecosystems.'); </script>
 This article originally appeared in <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist</a> at <a href="https://new-grist-preprod.go-vip.net/article/alaska-teen-testifies-on-climate-change/">https://new-grist-preprod.go-vip.net/article/alaska-teen-testifies-on-climate-change/</a>.
 <link href="https://new-grist-preprod.go-vip.net/article/alaska-teen-testifies-on-climate-change/" rel="canonical"/>
 Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at <a href="https://grist.org/">Grist.org</a>
 <script id="grist-syndication-pixel" async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TG2PKBX" data-source="repub" data-canonical="https://new-grist-preprod.go-vip.net/article/alaska-teen-testifies-on-climate-change/" data-title="Alaska teen testifies on climate change" crossorigin="anonymous"/>

Our goal at Grist is to tell stories about climate solutions and a just future. That means we love when other outlets share our work. If you’re interested in republishing this story online or in print, we just have a few requirements:

Credit us.

For the byline, we prefer Author Name, Grist. At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist’s weekly newsletter here.”

Check the image requirements.

Photos sourced from Getty Images in our pieces can be republished as long as you credit both Getty and Grist in the caption. Outside of this, you can’t republish photographs or illustrations without written permission from Grist and/or the photographer.

Don’t change anything significant.

You can change the headline and/or subheading, but articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s ok to change references to time (“yesterday” to “today”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). If you really think changing the story with additional localized copy would help, please contact us directly and we can discuss the change. We must approve the change before it goes live.

Don’t sell our stories.

We also ask that you don’t sell ads specifically meant to be placed in our stories. If you already have ads populating on your site, that’s completely fine.

Keep in contact.

Let us know if you republish our content! As a nonprofit news site, tracking the impact of our reporting and analysis is crucial. We’d love to hear more about how the work was useful to you and your outlet. And on the off chance that we ask you to remove the story from your site or apply a correction, please do so.

Use best practices for sharing.

If you do share the story on your social media accounts, we’d love it if you tagged Grist’s accounts:

Twitter: @Grist
Facebook: @Grist.org
Instagram: @Grist

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Get your weekly dose of good climate news to your inbox

Republish this article | See instructions below: