I’ve been thinking for a while about how to respond to this interview with Newt Gingrich, but to be honest, Gingrich’s sociopathic dishonesty fills me with such revulsion that I am rendered inarticulate. I guess that makes me a failure as a blogger.

The one thing I’d say is: the move here is to jump from oil shale and coal and other carbon-intensive fuels to “reducing the carbon loading of the atmosphere” via frenzied handwaving at technology. It is, quite literally, hope as a strategy.

Help Grist raise $25,000 by September 30 to further advance our climate reporting

Okay, two things. The big innovation here for conservatives is, as Gingrich says flat out, to abandon any rhetorical fealty to laissez faire economics. Not in favor of regulation, mind you — he explicitly renounces regulation or anything mandatory — but in favor of “incentives,” i.e., pork. The right has long been pro-business rather than pro-market; Gingrich’s brilliant breakthrough is just to brazenly embrace that position.

So that’s the fancy new green conservatism: hand out public money to powerful energy corporations and hope for the best. You comfortable betting the future of the planet on that strategy?