Oregon transportation officials are doing everything in their power to keep the state’s residents in the dark about the movement of crude-filled, explosion-prone rail cars.
The Oregonian won a two-month battle in March when the state Department of Justice ruled that the state Department of Transportation was of course legally required to provide information it receives about the oil shipments to the daily newspaper. Failing to do so “could infringe on the publicâs ability to assess the local and statewide risks,” a Justice Department attorney advised.
“Risks shmisks,” the Transportation Department replied. It heavily redacted reports it had received from the rail companies before releasing them to the journalists — and then kicked the intrasigence up a notch. The department told rail companies to stop submitting reports because such reports would become public. (Rail companies have broken promises to share this type of data with the federal government. Oregon transportation officials claim publishing the information is a security risk, despite the fact that oil-laden rail cars are already clearly labeled.) From The Oregonian:
The Oregon Department of Transportation, the stateâs rail safety overseer, says it will no longer ask railroads for reports detailing where crude oil moves through the state after The Oregonian successfully sought to have them made public.
Railroads âprovided us courtesy copies with the understanding we wouldnât share it — believing it might be protected,â ODOT spokesman David Thompson said in an email. âWe now know that the info is NOT protected; so do the railroads.â …
State law requires railroads to annually submit detailed reports saying what dangerous substances theyâve moved, where and in what volume. Theyâre due to emergency responders across the state by March 1 of each year. That hasnât been happening.
The reports have been sent to ODOT instead, which historically acted as a central hub, providing the information on request to firefighters across the state.
ODOT officials say that process needs reform. But as ODOT begins working to change those disclosure rules, its officials say they no longer need any reports.
Keeping this kind of information secret won’t just make it hard for residents to make decisions about where they can live and travel safely. It will make it more difficult for the Transportation Department to do its job. “Thereâs no other place to get the data,” a retired department rail safety inspector told the paper.